As of January 1, 2020, a new California law mandates that drivers on public roads who approach or pass stopped waste service vehicles — that are readily identified and have their amber lights flashing — must do so at a safe speed and distance “without interfering with the safe operation of the waste service vehicle…” Drivers must only pass from an adjacent available lane and in conditions safe to both pedestrians and other vehicles.

To read the full text of AB 2115, click here:

AB 1884 - Plastic Straw Ban

Assembly Bill 1884, which went into effect on January 1, 2019, now prohibits “sit-down” restaurants in California from providing single-use straws, unless requested by customers. Straws made from non-plastic materials, including but not limited to paper, pasta, sugar cane, wood, or bamboo are exempt. Restaurants violating the law could be fined $25 per day or a maximum of $300 per year.

Ian Calderon, the assemblyman who authored the bill, stated: “We need to create awareness around the issue of one-time plastic straws and their detrimental effects on our landfills, waterways, and oceans. It (AB 1884) is a small step towards curbing our reliance on these convenience products, which will hopefully contribute to a change in consumer attitudes and usage.”

Click here to see the text of Assembly Bill 1884.

We are proud to announce that R3 Project Analyst Claire Wilson and Marketing Coordinator Kristy Dalay were awarded two out of the four 2019 Young Professionals Scholarships from the California Resource Recovery Association!

To learn more about CRRA and how young professionals can participate, click here.

3 Principal Garth Schultz presenting at San Rafael City Council meeting

R3 Principal, Garth Schultz, featured in news story on rate hikes in City of San Rafael. See story on KTVU News here!

To read the full article, click here.





Plastic Bales


  • Beijing notified the World Trade Organization in July 2017 that it planned to ban the import of 24 varieties of solid waste and recyclables (e.g., certain plastics and unsorted paper), and lower the minimum required contamination level from 1.5% to 0.3%.
  • The ban is part of a broader Chinese customs program called “Operation Green Fence,” which began in 2013 and aims to reduce waste importation and contamination of recyclable materials. The latest phase of this operation is called “National Sword” which increases enforcement and bans the import of many materials.
  • The import ban went into effect January 1, 2018. This has already begun to disrupt the recycling industry as bales of recyclables are piling up in waste facilities internationally. Although the contamination threshold has been relaxed to 0.5%, facility operators say this standard is still very difficult to meet.

Before the Green Sword Fell

Due to the United States’ large trade imbalance with China there is little demand for space in shipping containers returning to China, and historically, cheap shipping space has been filled by the solid waste materials our recycling industry sends to Chinese manufacturers. Combined with China’s large, inexpensive labor force, this made it cheaper for China to recycle imported material than to make those materials from raw feedstock. This dynamic also created a large volume outlet for the U.S. recycling industry, which has an abundance of scrap metal, paper, plastic, rubber and electronics that China needed to satisfy the demands of its growing manufacturing sector. Waste and recyclable materials are the sixth largest U.S. export to China, and in 2016 China processed at least half of the world’s exports of waste plastic, paper and metals.

Shockwaves Through the Recycling Industry

In 2017 news of the impending ban brought panic to recycling operators on an international scale. This change in international law represents a major upset to the flow of global recyclables, resulting in mounting stockpiles of waste materials in facilities that currently have no outlet. Many in the industry are concerned that this material will end up being landfilled or incinerated.

China has stated reasons for these new policies are related to environmental and public health. Imported garbage reportedly is filling China’s landfills and polluting waterways, while its workers face dangerous conditions and exposure to toxic chemicals. Economically, importing foreign waste was also becoming less attractive for China as its cost of labor rose and the demand for materials fell, although we understand that Chinese paper mills and other recycling industries are now paying significantly higher prices for the raw material they once purchased overseas as recycling feedstock.

Impacts to Recycling at Home and Internationally

For many materials collected through U.S. recycling programs sufficient markets and processing capacity do not currently exist outside China. Countries in Southeast Asia, such as Vietnam, Malaysia and Thailand, offer an outlet for the world’s exported waste materials but do not currently have the ability to accept the volume of recyclable material that was being shipped to China. The resulting surplus of materials will drive down prices for recyclables on the global market, while some materials have no clear destination. In addition, to help meet the 0.5% threshold processing facilities would need to slow down their sort lines and expend more labor to reduce contamination to an acceptable level, which will increase the cost of processing recyclables.

Markets in China and elsewhere remain for higher grade recyclables and recycled commodities. The ban presents an opportunity to review and improve recycling programs, as exporting countries will need to consider ways to reduce their waste and enhance their own recycling systems. For example, “wishful recycling” has created a contamination problem that must be addressed, potentially through renewed public education efforts and/or advanced waste processing technology.

China has grown increasingly concerned about how to better manage its own waste, and reportedly is limiting cheap waste imports in an effort to stimulate its waste management industry and establish an effective recycling system. At present it’s estimated that China generates more than 520,000 tons a day, most of which is landfilled or incinerated. China is also ranked as the globe’s worst ocean polluter, bringing hope that the Green Sword will catalyze a change in how much of China’s plastics and other waste ends up at sea.


Fact Sheet: Oregon Refuse & Recycling Association, China set to ban import of many recyclable

Article: China No Longer Wants Your Trash. Here’s Why That’s Potentially Disastrous

Article: Waste Management: Headwinds From China Ban on Foreign Waste

R3 Consulting Group Now Offers:

Disaster Debris Management Planning Assistance to California Cities

No one is ever completely ready to handle a natural disaster, but with our help, you can avoid spending unnecessary funds, resources and time in the event of a disaster. We specialize in creating disaster debris management plans that are unique to your community, meaning you’ll have a plan in place when you need it most. Not only that, but municipalities with disaster debris management plans will be prepared in the event of a disaster, meaning time and energy are maximized, along with potential for FEMA reimbursement if protocols are followed. Let us help you navigate through the complicated process of disaster debris planning and make sure your FEMA reimbursement dollars are maximized.

Last month FEMA extended its Alternative Procedures Pilot Program which allows for up to an extra 2% of federal cost share reimbursement on money spent.  The opportunity to participate in this pilot program will be available through June 2018.  There is no better time than now to start planning.

Once we complete your plan and it is reviewed by FEMA for this program, the municipality will be eligible for this additional 2% reimbursement – money that you would have otherwise been spent out of pocket if no plan was in place.

Our plans are:

  • CalOES Approved
  • FEMA Approved
  • Guaranteed to participate in the Public Assistance Alternative Procedures Pilot Program (time dependent)

FEMA timeline of disaster reimbursement

(Above: FEMA timeline of disaster reimbursement)

More About Our Process

We will consider:

  • The type of disaster(s) that may potentially occur in your community
  • Your staffing levels and who would play certain roles when a disaster occurs
  • Your opportunities for procuring various contracted disaster debris management services
  • Potential sites in your limits that could be used for temporary debris removal and storage
  • Public information examples

Our process includes:

  1. Meeting with you to obtain base level data and confirm expectations of our services
  2. Providing the jurisdiction with a Draft 1 disaster debris management plan (DDMP)
  3. Reviewing the draft DDMP with the jurisdiction
  4. Providing the draft to CalOES, who will review the plan for completeness
  5. Revising the draft based on CalOES comment and provide a new draft to CalOES (this may take multiple iterations)

CalOES will forward the draft plan to FEMA once it has approved the plan. Once FEMA has approved the plan, you’re all set!

DDMPs are essential for:

  • Saving time and money
  • Having a quick and effective response to and preparation for a disaster
  • More efficient use of limited resources, including staff time

“Congratulations – that was an awesome plan. It was the best one I’ve ever reviewed.”   – Melinda Stehr, CalOES

A new piece of legislation just passed in September that concerns displaced employees and solid waste service contracts. AB 1669: Read more

SB 1383 places limitations on organic waste in landfills to reduce methane emissions. Governor Brown approved SB 1383 in September 2016, and I wanted to give everyone a quick update. Here are the highlights: Read more